Hi,
we're considering mysql cluster for a product that has 4-5 really large tables (tens of millions of rows) and many small tables.
I know that ndb stores all indexed data in memory. It seems like a big waste because of the 50M rows in the whole table - we actively use only few thousands of rows. Data is added and read only from one end of the table.
So the question is whether mysql cluster is the right solution for it?
Any advice is appreciated.
we're considering mysql cluster for a product that has 4-5 really large tables (tens of millions of rows) and many small tables.
I know that ndb stores all indexed data in memory. It seems like a big waste because of the 50M rows in the whole table - we actively use only few thousands of rows. Data is added and read only from one end of the table.
So the question is whether mysql cluster is the right solution for it?
Any advice is appreciated.