Hello,
i had set up a 2 Node NDB-Cluster. In order to keep the RAM-consumption low, we decided to place a couple of tables in disk space, using "STORAGE DISK".
While i alter a table with "ALTER TABLE table1 TABLESPACE table1 STORAGE DISK ENINGE NDBCLUSTER" i can see on the management node that the data memory is increasing such an alter without "...TABLESPACE table1 STORAGE DISK..."
That index memory is increasing is ok, because indices are stored completely in RAM. But the data memory should'nt increase if i use "STORAGE DISK", am i right? For this case i have the tablespaces with the associated data files, i thought.
So it looks like that the "STORAGE DISK" has no effect! Can anybody help me with this issues?
Thanks a lot!
i had set up a 2 Node NDB-Cluster. In order to keep the RAM-consumption low, we decided to place a couple of tables in disk space, using "STORAGE DISK".
While i alter a table with "ALTER TABLE table1 TABLESPACE table1 STORAGE DISK ENINGE NDBCLUSTER" i can see on the management node that the data memory is increasing such an alter without "...TABLESPACE table1 STORAGE DISK..."
That index memory is increasing is ok, because indices are stored completely in RAM. But the data memory should'nt increase if i use "STORAGE DISK", am i right? For this case i have the tablespaces with the associated data files, i thought.
So it looks like that the "STORAGE DISK" has no effect! Can anybody help me with this issues?
Thanks a lot!